Quick exit

What Is Stonewalling? Signs, Why It Hurts, What Helps

A short clip and a longer read.

Β·9:14 video
Read the guide
Video is playing in the corner β€” scroll up to dock it here
What Is Stonewalling? Signs, Why It Hurts, What Helps
Jump to
The short version

Stonewalling is when someone refuses to engage in a conversation you need to have, going quiet, deflecting, or shutting the discussion down. It leaves you without answers or closure. You cannot force someone to talk to you, but you can limit how much energy you give the situation and decide what you need next for your own wellbeing.

  • Defining stonewalling
  • Why it hurts empaths
  • Why people do it
  • Not the same as NPD
  • Deciding to let go

What is stonewalling?

Stonewalling is when you try to have a conversation with someone and they simply will not engage. They might go silent, change the subject, give vague non-answers, or flatly refuse to discuss the issue at all. However many times you try, and whatever angle you take, it feels like hitting a brick wall.

If you recognise this, you are not imagining it and you are not being difficult for wanting to talk. Wanting clarity and dialogue in a relationship is healthy. The frustration you feel when someone won't meet you there is a completely understandable response to a real pattern, not a sign that something is wrong with you.

One small step: next time it happens, notice it without judging yourself for feeling upset. Naming the pattern to yourself, "this is stonewalling", is often the first steady ground you get to stand on.

Why it hits empathic people so hard

If you are someone who values honesty, connection and resolving things properly, being stonewalled can feel unbearable. That's not a flaw in you, it's because you care about the relationship enough to want it to work.

Many people who describe themselves as empathic or sensitive find it especially hard to simply drop an unresolved issue. You may find yourself trying again and again, coming at the conversation from a different angle, hoping this time will be different. That instinct comes from a good place, wanting connection and understanding, but it can also leave you exhausted and stuck in limbo, waiting for a resolution that never comes.

There is nothing wrong with wanting dialogue. What matters is recognising when your effort is going into a conversation that the other person is simply not willing to have.

Next step: try writing down, honestly, how many times you've attempted this same conversation. Seeing the number can help you decide how much more energy feels right to give it.

Why someone might stonewall you

People stonewall for many reasons, and it isn't always deliberate cruelty. Sometimes it comes from feeling overwhelmed, from not having the skills to sit with conflict, or, in some cases, from a wish to avoid accountability by shutting the conversation down.

Whatever the reason behind it, healthy relationships depend on both people being willing to communicate, and consistently avoiding difficult conversations erodes trust over time. It's worth remembering that everyone has free will. People do not owe us their explanations, even when we feel we deserve one. That's a hard truth, but accepting it, rather than fighting it, is often what allows you to stop banging your head against the same wall.

Next step: ask yourself honestly whether this is a one-off (stress, a bad week) or a repeated pattern. That distinction matters for what you do next.

Is stonewalling the same as narcissistic abuse?

Not necessarily, and it's important to be careful here. Stonewalling is a communication behaviour. It can appear in all sorts of relationships, including healthy ones going through a hard patch. It is not, on its own, evidence that someone has narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), which is a formal clinical diagnosis that, per the DSM-5-TR, applies to a small proportion of the population and can only be diagnosed by a qualified professional.

What we can say is that when stonewalling is used repeatedly and deliberately to avoid accountability, deny reality, or control the direction of a relationship, it can form part of a wider pattern sometimes described as narcissistic abuse. This is a pattern of behaviour, not a diagnosis, and it's important not to conflate the two. If you're worried a relationship involves coercive control, Women's Aid and Refuge both offer guidance and support specifically around these patterns, without requiring you to label the other person.

Next step: if this pattern is affecting your sense of safety or self-worth, our support page has confidential next steps, and organisations like Refuge and Women's Aid are there if you need to talk it through.

What you can actually do

You cannot make someone talk to you. What you can do is decide how much of your energy this conversation gets, and for how long. That's not giving up, it's protecting yourself.

It's fine to try again, once or twice, calmly and clearly. But set yourself a limit. If you notice you're bringing up the same issue for the fifth or sixth time with no movement, that's information. Continuing indefinitely rarely brings clarity, it usually just brings more hurt.

BACP-registered counsellors often describe this as the difference between healthy persistence and self-abandonment: at some point, continuing to push for a conversation that isn't coming costs you more than it gives you.

Next step: pick a realistic limit for yourself, for example, one more calm attempt, then a pause, rather than an open-ended cycle of trying.

Knowing when to let go

Sometimes the most respectful thing you can do for yourself is to accept that the conversation isn't coming, and to grieve that, rather than keep waiting. This doesn't mean you're saying the issue didn't matter. It means you're recognising that one person alone cannot hold a conversation open forever.

Letting go often brings sadness, and sometimes guilt: you might start wondering if you were the problem. Please hear this: it is not automatically about you. Sometimes it is about the other person's own capacity or willingness to engage, and that is genuinely outside your control.

Acceptance here doesn't mean liking the situation. It means you stop pouring energy into something that isn't moving, so you can start the process of grieving what you'd hoped the relationship could be.

If letting go of this relationship brings up feelings of real hopelessness, please don't carry that alone. Our support page has confidential next steps, and Samaritans (116 123) are available any time, day or night.

Next step: give yourself permission to feel sad about this without rushing to fix it today.

Putting your energy back into you

Once you've decided to stop chasing a conversation that isn't coming, the next step is redirecting that energy somewhere that will actually grow. Staying fixated on an unresolved conversation, replaying it, analysing it, hoping for a different outcome, tends to feed anxiety and low mood rather than resolve anything.

That energy can go somewhere better: a hobby, a friendship, your own goals, even something new and slightly outside your comfort zone. This isn't about pretending it didn't hurt. It's about choosing, deliberately, to invest in your own life rather than in a door that isn't opening.

Noticing this pattern, and choosing differently, is often the first real act of getting your life back.

Next step: pick one small thing this week that's just for you, unconnected to this relationship, and give it the attention you've been giving the unresolved conversation.

Frequently asked questions

Can stonewalling happen without someone realising they're doing it?

Yes. Some people stonewall because they feel overwhelmed or don't have the tools to handle conflict, rather than to deliberately hurt you. The impact on you is real either way, but it's worth knowing the intent isn't always malicious.

Does stonewalling count as controlling behaviour?

It can, particularly if it's used repeatedly to avoid accountability or keep you off balance. Women's Aid and Refuge have guidance on recognising controlling patterns if you're concerned.

Should I confront someone about stonewalling me?

You can name what you've noticed calmly, but be prepared that they may not engage even then. It's often more useful to focus on your own limits than on getting a particular reaction from them.

Can counselling help if I keep experiencing this?

Yes. A BACP-registered counsellor can help you understand your own patterns in these situations and build healthier ways of communicating and setting limits.

Working this out on your own is exhausting.

You don't have to. The Changemakers programme gives you a clear, guided path β€” at your own pace, with Keeley alongside you.

Written and presented by Keeley Taverner Psychotherapist, BACP accredited, founder of Key for Change. The video is Keeley's original talk; the guide is her expanded written version of it.
Sources & trusted organisations

Where this guide’s information comes from